Disability and the "art" of interpretation

This study is focused on the relationship between treaty interpretation methods and the protection granted to the plaintiffs by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in its judgment of Gonzales Lluy et al. v. Ecuador. Based on a case law analysis of the Courts jurisprudence, this study explores judicial interpretation and the possible consequences of this landmark judgment in the protection of disability rights.Findings suggest that in the Gonzales Lluy et al. v. Ecuador case, the Court applied objective procedural-standards to limit the sphere of its judicial freedom with critical results. the study found that since the American Convention does not contain explicit references to the human rights of persons with disabilities, the concept of discrimination or the Court s competence to rule on the violation of the right to education, the Court reached its conclusions by interpreting the American Convention in light of the regional and universal corpus iuris. In so doing, the Court reinforced the concept of legal interpretation as an "art" since it exercised its "creation" power using different means of interpretation in a particular mixed operation.

Autorentext

A. C. Caballero-Pérez. Abogada de Colombia, con Maestría en Sociología y Maestría en Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos de la Universidad de Lund en Suecia. Actualmente, es investigadora de doctorado en la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Maastricht (MU), y trabaja en el proyecto DARE (Disability Advocacy Research in Europe).