Eurasian Legal Systems in a World in Transition

The period of Eurasian countries going their own, national(ist) way in building a legal system as modus operandi (Europe before 1950, Central Asia under Soviet rule, East Asia in colonialisms) has yielded to one when no 'universal' system applies.

Eurasia is neither a juxtaposition of sub-regions Central Asia, West Europe, East Asia nor a single, coherent legal system. It mixes sui generis evolutions and mutual influences of its constituent systems. The period of Eurasian countries going their own, national(ist) way in building a legal system (Europe before 1950, Central Asia under Soviet rule, East Asia in colonialisms) has yielded to one when no 'universal' system applies. Regional mechanisms are mutually inspired, for instance the EU and the EAEU; or the OSCE and the CICA.

Chapters are by scholars based in Korea, Kazakhstan, France, China, Russia and Spain. Each sub-region is analysed through a 'main' reference (Kazakhstan, France, Korea) and a 'complementary model' (Russia, China, Spain), within the context of institutional region-building.C

Two factors accelerate change in Eurasian legal systems: national/regional experiences and evolutions influence each other; the world context (crises, sanctions, wars, trade diplomacy) push even further : no country (or region) can in isolation devise legal solutions to these challenges.

Autorentext

Remus Titiriga (PhD in Law, Nancy University) is Professor at InHa Law School (International Economic Law, Trade Law, and European Law).

Hye-Hwal Seong (PhD in Law, Indiana University) is Professor at InHa Law School and Vice-President of the Korea Securities Law Association.

Zhuldyz Saraimbaeva (PhD in Law, KazNU) is Director of the International Law Department (KazNU), focusing on International Economic Law.

Pierre Chabal (Sc Dr in IR, IEP), Director of Lexfeim (France), Co-founder of KazNU Center for European Law. Founder in 2014 of these Kazakh-French-Korean law seminars.

Klappentext

Eurasia is neither a juxtaposition of sub-regions - Central Asia, West Europe, East Asia - nor a single, coherent legal system. It mixes sui generis evolutions and mutual influences of its constituent systems. The period of Eurasian countries going their own, national(ist) way in building a legal system (Europe before 1950, Central Asia under Soviet rule, East Asia in colonialisms) has yielded to one when no 'universal' system applies. Regional mechanisms are mutually inspired, for instance the EU and the EAEU; or the OSCE and the CICA.

Chapters are by scholars based in Korea, Kazakhstan, France, China, Russia and Spain. Each sub-region is analysed through a 'main' reference (Kazakhstan, France, Korea) and a 'complementary model' (Russia, China, Spain), within the context of institutional region-building.C

Two factors accelerate change in Eurasian legal systems: national/regional experiences and evolutions influence each other; the world context (crises, sanctions, wars, trade diplomacy...) push even further : no country (or region) can in isolation devise legal solutions to these challenges.

Inhalt
Part I - Challenges and turmoil in the region: when conflictual dynamics take over from Covid and jeopardize the context of cooperation
Part II Legal, political and economic impact on commercial institutions (EAEU, EU ) and cooperation agreements (Silk Roads )
Part III - Legal and political impact on security institutions (SCO, CSTO ): expansion, re-'centration' or deconstruction of great ensembles ?
Part IV - Artificial Intelligence and Big data