Grandeur, Independence, and Proportionality

General discussions about nuclear nonproliferation and arms control often focus on the responsibilities of the actors with the largest arsenals and the importance of implementing deep reductions. However, it is worthwhile to also consider the significance of the smaller nuclear weapon states. France presents an interesting case from a nonproliferation standpoint as a country that developed a smaller nuclear arsenal believing it would allow them to effectively counter the threat of a larger power. This idea led to the development of the principle of "proportionality" in their strategic doctrine. A key feature of Proportional Nuclear Deterrence theory is that it does not rely on the size of a nuclear arsenal for effectiveness. Thus, in contrast to the nuclear superpowers, sizeable cuts to a nuclear arsenal would not represent a strategic change under a Proportional Nuclear Deterrence policy. This observation has significant implications for current nonproliferation efforts and the future of arms control.

Autorentext

Erik S. Woloszczuk, MPA Candidate, Studied Nonproliferation, Public Affairs, and European Studies at the University of Washington.