Optimize Structural Topology and Computer Experimental Design

Two new topology optimization methods are presentedand many sampling design methodologies for computerexperiments are compared. HIMO combines a sizingoptimizer with a metamodeling technique. A sizingoptimizer finds feasible and optimal solutions insize (e.g. plate thickness). All performanceconstraints are handled. Then a metamodel is to fitall optimal solutions and is then used to find theoptimal topology design. Only the objective (e.g.weight) is approximated, thus large-scale structuralsystems can be optimized. HIMO resulted in 18% and36% weight savings for two real projects. SOTOdirectly uses a sizing optimizer to optimizetopology as well as thickness. The thinner elementsare gradually deleted to achieve improved topology.The design problem is then reformulated with muchfewer design variables for final sizingoptimization. To improve metamodeling in HIMO, 18experimental design methods are compared. Samplesizes affect accuracy more than design types. Enoughsamples are needed to achieve low error with one-stage sampling. More uniform sampling does notgenerally lead to more accurate prediction unlessinvolving extremely non-uniformity.

Autorentext

Dr. Longjun Liu is a principal analyst for R&D projects for new space vehicles, with BSME, MSSE, MSEM, and Ph.D. in Systems Science focusing on engineering optimization with statistical methodologies. He is the author of conference and journal papers on statistical computer experiments, structural optimization, stress/fatigue analysis.

Klappentext
Two new topology optimization methods are presented and many sampling design methodologies for computer experiments are compared. HIMO combines a sizing optimizer with a metamodeling technique. A sizing optimizer finds feasible and optimal solutions in size (e.g. plate thickness). All performance constraints are handled. Then a metamodel is to fit all optimal solutions and is then used to find the optimal topology design. Only the objective (e.g. weight) is approximated, thus large-scale structural systems can be optimized. HIMO resulted in 18% and 36% weight savings for two real projects. SOTO directly uses a sizing optimizer to optimize topology as well as thickness. The thinner elements are gradually deleted to achieve improved topology. The design problem is then reformulated with much fewer design variables for final sizing optimization. To improve metamodeling in HIMO, 18 experimental design methods are compared. Sample sizes affect accuracy more than design types. Enough samples are needed to achieve low error with one- stage sampling. More uniform sampling does not generally lead to more accurate prediction unless involving extremely non-uniformity.