A Comparative Analysis Between Sukuk and Conventional Bonds

The instruments are an important way to finance in the Islamic financial system. It also prohibits usury (interest) in Islam and conventional bonds are not suitable for investors in the Islamic countries. Since its launch in the 1980s, and gained instruments recognition and popularity as an alternative to conventional bonds. The aim of this study is to analyze the similarities and differences between traditional instruments and bonds in terms of risk and return characteristics. This study employs a comparative analysis of traditional instruments and bonds. Data were collected on traditional instruments and bonds from eight countries, including Malaysia, Saudi Arabia (KSA), United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey and Kuwait. The main results showed that the inclusion of instruments in the portfolios of conventional bonds to reduce the risk of a mixed portfolio appears. This is important to note that if this works in the long term, and instruments can provide an opportunity to diversify the much needed international investors in fixed-income securities.

Autorentext

Dr. Hebah Shalhoob an Assistant Professor at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University.Her research interests is in the area of Islamic banking and finance. She received a BA in Accounting from King Abdul Aziz University in 2006, MSc in accounting and finance from the University of Dundee in 2011, and a PhD from Robert Gordon University in 2016.