A Semiotic and Rhetorical Study of Anti-Islam and Pro-Islam Cartoons

Islamophobia is one of the most prevailing phenomena in the Western world after 9/11 events. At the same time America launches a military war against Muslim countries, an intellectual war also begins. Its weapons are political speeches, talk shows, newspapers articles, and the most important among all; cartoons. This study tries to cover the semiotic and rhetorical techniques prevailing in a collection of American anti-Islam and also pro-Islam cartoons. It compares both kinds of cartoons to give a better understanding of how language can reveal hidden messages. It also answers two important questions: do anti-Islam cartoons express a freedom of speech, or reveal an abusive content? And how do pro-Islam cartoons face this?

Autorentext

Muhammad Abdulwahab Amer has B.A in language and literature and M.A in English Linguistics from Banha University. Currently, he is a PhD candidate. His area covers semiotics, rhetoric, and translation. He works as a certified translator and English instructor.