Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray

Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray's focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is ontological, wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis.
By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray's work, this book identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified phases in Irigaray's thought (despite some critics' concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray's conceptualization of sexuate difference one that always already implies an ethical project.
The text demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray's Heideggerian inheritance especially prominent in her later texts is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a relational limit for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy.

Clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray's conceptualization of sexuate difference Shows that Irigaray's Heideggerian inheritance illuminates how sexuate difference is ontological Identifies a continuity between the three self-identified phases of Irigaray's work

Autorentext
Emma R. Jones is a psychotherapist in private practice in the San Francisco East Bay Area. She was educated at the New School; the University of Oregon, where she earned her PhD in philosophy; and the California Institute of Integral studies, where she earned her clinical degree. She is the author of several articles engaging the work of Luce Irigaray as well as phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and ancient Greek philosophy.

Klappentext

Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray s focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is ontological, wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray s work, this book identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified phases in Irigaray s thought (despite some critics concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray s conceptualization of sexuate difference one that always already implies an ethical project. The text demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray s Heideggerian inheritance especially prominent in her later texts is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a relational limit for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy.

Inhalt

1. Introduction: Being and Sexuate Difference.- 2. Relation and RefusaL: Irigaray and Lacan.- 3. Hearing Silence, Speaking Language: Irigaray and Heidegger.- 4. The Enunciation of Place: Dialogues.- 5. Speaking at the Limit: Ethics, Ontology, Language.- 6. Love and (Re) Birth at the Limit.