Wir verwenden Cookies und Analyse-Tools, um die Nutzerfreundlichkeit der Internet-Seite zu verbessern und für Marketingzwecke. Wenn Sie fortfahren, diese Seite zu verwenden, nehmen wir an, dass Sie damit einverstanden sind. Zur Datenschutzerklärung.
Conventional Versus Tubeless PCNL
Details
The Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)is now become a fast and routine procedure for nephrolithiasis in most urological centres. The aim of study is to assess the changes in standard procedure and its outcome on patient morbidity. As we discussed that the conventional procedure need the placement of nephrostomy tube, so we assess , is the nephrostomy tube, is really worthwhile after procedure? if needed, is it necessary to put the large bore tube instead of small bore tube. we compare, the outcome of large bore, with small bore, and tubeless PCNL. we comes on conclusion, that patients with tubeless have definitely edge over those group having nephrostomy tube, with no added morbidity.
Autorentext
imran HusainSenior Registrar UrologySir Ganga Ram Hospital LahorePakistanInterest in endourology, pakistan Geographically falls in stone belt, Nearly 60% of urology bed are occupied by Patients suffering from stone disease, so minimal invasive surgery is best hope for these Patients.
Weitere Informationen
- Allgemeine Informationen
- Sprache Englisch
- Autor Imran Husain , Muhammad Tahir , Muhammad Usman
- Titel Conventional Versus Tubeless PCNL
- ISBN 978-3-659-21855-2
- Format Kartonierter Einband (Kt)
- EAN 9783659218552
- Jahr 2012
- Größe H220mm x B150mm x T4mm
- Untertitel A Randomized comparison of Large bore, versus small bore versus Tubeless Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- Gewicht 106g
- Auflage Aufl.
- Genre Medizin
- Anzahl Seiten 60
- Herausgeber LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
- GTIN 09783659218552