Early Zhuangzi Commentaries

The Zhuangzi is a text needing no introduction. As
one of the principle works of Chinese Daoist
philosophy, the Zhuangzi may be a well known title
but few have grasped its true meaning. Although the
commentary by Guo Xiang does so extremely well, it is
taken for granted as being the only one worthy of
in-depth discussion. This book forgoes the commentary
of Guo Xiang, offering a phonetic and hermeneutic
reading of the other five major commentaries in use
prior to the Tang dynasty, many of which survive in
fragmentary form as glosses to the Zhuangzi Yinyi
(Sounds and Meanings of the Zhuangzi) by Lu Deming.
While they may not possess the sophistication of Guo
Xiang, they nevertheless provide us with an important
investigative tool when it comes to the sounds and
meanings of the Zhuangzi. Indeed, the various
phonetic and hermeneutic interpretations of these
early commentators can only further our understanding
of this linguistically beautiful but philosophically
challenging text while freeing us from the weight of
commentarial authority traditionally assigned to Guo
Xiang.

Autorentext
David Chai is currently working towards completing his PhD thesis on the notion of the Sublime in the thought of Zhuangzi at the University of Toronto, Canada. His areas of research include pre-Han Chinese Thought, neo-Daoism, Chinese Aesthetics, Hermeneutics, and Philology.

Klappentext
The Zhuangzi is a text needing no introduction. As one of the principle works of Chinese Daoist philosophy, the Zhuangzi may be a well known title but few have grasped its true meaning. Although the commentary by Guo Xiang does so extremely well, it is taken for granted as being the only one worthy of in-depth discussion. This book forgoes the commentary of Guo Xiang, offering a phonetic and hermeneutic reading of the other five major commentaries in use prior to the Tang dynasty, many of which survive in fragmentary form as glosses to the Zhuangzi Yinyi (Sounds and Meanings of the Zhuangzi) by Lu Deming. While they may not possess the sophistication of Guo Xiang, they nevertheless provide us with an important investigative tool when it comes to the sounds and meanings of the Zhuangzi. Indeed, the various phonetic and hermeneutic interpretations of these early commentators can only further our understanding of this linguistically beautiful but philosophically challenging text while freeing us from the weight of commentarial authority traditionally assigned to Guo Xiang.