Evaluating A Negotiated Rulemaking Process

Cape Hatteras National Seashore (CAHA) engaged in a Negotiated Rulemaking process to create an Off Road Vehicle Management Rule. This dissertation used Senecah's (2004) practical theory Trinity of Voice to evaluate CAHA's negotiated rulemaking process. Interviews with park staff and negotiated rulemaking participants provided information about the presence of the grammars of TOV in this decision making process. This dissertation described the affects of negotiated rulemaking on the perceptions of participants towards the park resources and management of the national seashore.

Autorentext

Texas A&M University (Aug. 2005 - Dec. 2009)College Station, Texas.PhD Recreation, Parks and Tourism ScienceAmerican University (Jan 2003 - May 2005)Washington, D.C. Masters of International Training and Education University of Pittsburgh (Aug. 1990 - Dec. 1994) Pittsburgh, PA.BA Rhetorical CommunicationsMinor African Studies