Extending the Common European Asylum System

With the Central and Eastern European (CEE) enlargement 2004/2007, the external borders of the EU were shifted eastwards. Prior to the accession process, the Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) possessed neither border control in its Western European stringent form, nor asylum systems. When preparing for enlargement, the EU and the candidate countries thus had to make sure that with accession, both border protection at the new external borders, and national asylum policies guaranteeing human rights in line with EU commitments were in place. This case study on Bulgaria analyses how asylum policy developed under influence of the European Union during the accession process and beyond. How exactly did the EU influence the candidate state, what was the result of such pressure, and to what degree do the new member state's asylum policies reflect the priorities and contradictions of EU asylum policy?

Autorentext

Johanna Grotendorst studied Governance and Public Policy at University of Passau and at Institut d'Etudes Politiques Toulouse. She completed the master program International Relations at Humboldt University Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and University of Potsdam in 2016. Her main research topics include human rights and the EU's asylum policy.