Protest Inside Tibet and Xinjiang

For the past sixty years, development rhetoric has marked Beijing s political agenda for Tibet and Xinjiang, in order to create social stability. In that time, both regions have shown incredible economic transformation, but in 2008 and 2009 both provinces engaged in violent uprisings. These protests were begun by peaceful means, but quickly turned violent, exposing multiple layers of underlying tension divided on ethnic lines. How can this disjuncture be explained after sixty years of integration and does the moral economy framework provide a useful analysis for the motivations behind these recent events?

Autorentext

Ryane holds a Master's of International and Area Studies from The University of Oklahoma. She dreams of traveling the world until she is old and gray, eating as much Chinese and Lebanese food as possible, teaching English as a second language, and changing the world for the better wherever she goes.

Klappentext

For the past sixty years, development rhetoric has marked Beijing s political agenda for Tibet and Xinjiang, in order to create social stability. In that time, both regions have shown incredible economic transformation, but in 2008 and 2009 both provinces engaged in violent uprisings. These protests were begun by peaceful means, but quickly turned violent, exposing multiple layers of underlying tension divided on ethnic lines. How can this disjuncture be explained after sixty years of integration and does the moral economy framework provide a useful analysis for the motivations behind these recent events?