Rethinking the Prosecutor's Discretion at the International Criminal Court.

This book investigates the discretionary powers of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and the boundaries to his discretion. These boundaries come first of all from the reviewing powers of the Chambers, but also from the control exercised by other subjects, such as States, the UN Security Council and the Assembly of the States Parties to the Rome Statute. Although from concepts such as gravity and interests of justice it might be inferred that the Prosecutor benefits from broad discretion, an in-depth analysis of these concepts, in conjunction with an investigation on the judicial reviewing powers of the Chambers at the investigation stage and in the confirmation of the charges proceedings, suggest that the Prosecutor's discretion should not be overestimated.

The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court is the first prosecutor of a permanent international criminal court and is responsible for investigating situations where international crimes appear having been committed and for prosecuting perpetrators of these crimes before the Court. The traditional contrast between those systems applying the principle of mandatory prosecution and those applying the discretionary principle, raised the question on the applicable model in the international criminal justice system. The traditional selectivity characterizing International Criminal Law, the limited resources, and the tendential use of procedural mechanisms familiar to common law systems before international criminal tribunals are some of the reasons leading scholars to attribute discretion to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court as well. The purpose of this book is to determine whether the Prosecutor effectively enjoys discretion and possibly to what extent. The statutory framework does not necessarily point towards a strong discretionary power of the Prosecutor, and practice reveals that the discretion granted to the Prosecutor in recent years seems sometimes to have jeopardized the effectiveness of his activities.

Autorentext
Jacopo Governa is currently Assistant Lawyer at the European Court of Human Rights. Previously, he was employed as Assistant Legal Officer at the Chambers of the International Criminal Court. He holds a Master's Degree in Law from the University of Verona (Italy) and a PhD in International Criminal Law from the University of Verona, where he has been teaching assistant in the courses of criminal law and international criminal law, and the University of Göttingen (Germany). His research mainly focuses on Italian and European criminal law, transnational and international criminal law, international criminal courts, tribunals, and procedure, with particular regard to the role of prosecutorial discretion in international criminal trials.

Inhalt
Introduction 1. Prosecutorial Discretion in National and International Criminal Law The Concept of Discretion The Prosecutor in National Legal Systems The Prosecutor in International Criminal Law Introduction to the Activity of the ICC Prosecutor 2. The Object of the ICC Prosecutor's Assessment The Reasonable Basis for the Initiation of an Investigation The Jurisdiction The Admissibility The Interests of Justice 3. The Control over the Activity of the ICC Prosecutor The Control from External Entities Judicial Control under Article 53 of the Statute Judicial Control under Article 58 of the Statute Judicial Control under Article 61 of the Statute Judicial Control throughout the Trial: The No Case to Answer Procedure Conclusions Abstracts in English, Italian, German Bibliography, Subject Index