Russian invasion of Ukraine

We present a compilation of the author's journalistic analyses made between April 2021 and February 2023 regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This account only reflects his perception and analysis of the moment he was living. In that sense, it can provide others, who in the future decide to approach the subject with greater rigor and depth, with a window into how the issues related to the war in Ukraine were seen, at least through his eyes and those of the analysts cited in his case. In spite of this, the compilation has a value. Reading it allows us to place ourselves in the author's point of view, from his place, and at that specific moment. Some of the things discussed may seem obvious to us today, but at the time they were not so obvious. Other things, perhaps, were omitted and the analysis that was made, therefore, was wrong, but in that case it is worth trying to understand what was not seen and why. In that sense, this compilation is not a primary source about the story itself, but about how many were telling that story.

Autorentext

Mauricio Meschoulam è un professore messicano di Relazioni internazionali dal 1993, analista e oratore internazionale. Ha conseguito un dottorato di ricerca in Politica e Amministrazione Pubblica con specializzazione in Terrorismo, Mediazione e Pace. Le sue aree di indagine riguardano il terrorismo e la costruzione della pace.

Klappentext

We present a compilation of the author's journalistic analyses made between April 2021 and February 2023 regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This account only reflects his perception and analysis of the moment he was living. In that sense, it can provide others, who in the future decide to approach the subject with greater rigor and depth, with a window into how the issues related to the war in Ukraine were seen, at least through his eyes and those of the analysts cited in his case. In spite of this, the compilation has a value. Reading it allows us to place ourselves in the author's point of view, from his place, and at that specific moment. Some of the things discussed may seem obvious to us today, but at the time they were not so obvious. Other things, perhaps, were omitted and the analysis that was made, therefore, was wrong, but in that case it is worth trying to understand what was not seen and why. In that sense, this compilation is not a primary source about the story itself, but about how many were telling that story.